Source Sebastian Pfütze

How Asia’s rise is changing the West and what it means for Germany

The rise of Asia and the ideas that lie behind it are shaping the 21st century. The hegemony of the West seems to be collapsing and with it Western norms and political ideals that many had taken for granted. These developments pose grave challenges, but they also offer opportunities to develop a new and more inclusive vantage point to look at world affairs, as the renowned author Pankaj Mishra pointed out in a public lecture organized by the Bertelsmann Stiftung on 20 May 2015 in Berlin.

[Translate to English:] Ansprechpartner

Pankaj Mishra spoke about “How Asia’s rise is changing the West and what it means for Germany“. He noted a gigantic geopolitical shift that has led to a new phase in the relations between the West and Asia. The question of how Asia’s rise is influencing the West is in itself a sign of a fundamental shift in thinking, as this question would not have been raised ten years ago.

He reminded his audience that both, the West and Asia, are ambiguous and contested terms which defy a simple definition. Germany, for example, did not consider itself a part of the West during the 19th and first half of the 20th century. Its political and cultural identity was built – at least in part – in opposition to the western values of enlightenment and the French revolution. The West was then largely confined to Britain, France and the US. Germany rejected unbridled market capitalism and rule by democratic majority and stood for superior values of an inward looking culture and a strong state. Only after 1945 did West Germany become a definite partner of the West. Since 1989, Eastern Europe also came under the umbrella of the West. Since 9/11, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and Guantanamo, there have been cracks in the alliance driven by ‘Western values’.

Play

Governmental information and national health platforms

When developing a structural model for a prospective national health platform, it seems reasonable to assume, at least at first, that some kind of state-run service would be the most ideal provider. We should not forget, however, that the provision of information by the state – which we define as the communication of a range of information, warnings and recommendations – is subject to specific legal standards and guidelines. In the video, Prof. Dr. Laura Schulte (Hochschule Bielefeld) examines the extent to which information can and should be provided by the state, if at all, and under what circumstances it is even possible and/or advisable to operate a national health platform in the form of a state-run information service.

Play

The future of national health systems

Digital health is a key enabler for efficient and high-performing health systems. However, to harness this potential, national healthcare systems need a clear vision and an architected plan for how to achieve this vision and shape the digital transformation. It is essential that national governments establish the rules of engagement and the boundaries in which the technology sector, industry, and other private sector partners can interact. A national health platform could bring innovations together in an interconnected system while also setting the rules of the game, defining the vision, determining the architecture, and selecting standards. Interview with Dr. Alain Labrique (Director of the Department of Digital Health and Innovation at the World Health Organization)

Play

The power of platform economy in the healthcare system

The digital transformation in healthcare goes far beyond the electronic recording of prescriptions, certificates, or vaccination records. It is reshaping the rules and conditions of the entire system and introducing new players: Globally operating tech companies are entering the European healthcare market with new platforms. They will consolidate data streams and, over time, evolve into influential gatekeepers. In this video bestselling-author Sangeet Paul Choudary (“Platform Revolution”) explains how the platform economy can change the health system.

Play

Governance and organization for a national health platform

When establishing a national healthcare platform, it is crucial to identify a suitable legal structure that fulfills all the necessary requirements and effectively supports the ecosystem in which it operates. In terms of ownership, a number of different options are available, each involving a variety of advantages and disadvantages. In this video Prof. Dr. Laura Schulte (Hochschule Bielefeld) explains whether the platform should be operated by a public or a private-sector actor.

Play

What are digital ecosystems?

The terms "platform" and "digital ecosystem" are frequently used in various contexts, but their precise meanings can be unclear. What distinguishes a digital ecosystem and how does it relate to the concept of a platform? Dr. Matthias Naab (Co-Founder of Full Flamingo, formerly at Fraunhofer IESE) provides the answers.

Play

Success factors of digital ecosystems

Offering numerous benefits to everyone involved, the collaborative nature of digital ecosystems and platform economies has led to significant transformations in various domains of life. In this video Dr. Marcus Trapp (co-founder of Full Flamingo, formerly at Fraunhofer IESE) highlights the appealing aspects of digital ecosystems and their platforms. Moreover he explores ways to harness their innovative potential.

Play

Vision of a national health platform (short)

Our event on the vision of a national health platform in one minute. In September 2023, we presented our concept (see also www.trusted-health-ecosystems.org/en) to around 100 stakeholders from the healthcare system.

The notions of the West and Asia are now being redefined. First and foremost among these notions, is the expectation that Asian countries have to follow a particular path of progress defined by the West’s own evolution in order to achieve prosperity and stability. According to Mishra, this traditional Western understanding of modernization does not fit the new reality of today’s Asia, which is characterized by a variety of unprecedented political forms and economic models challenging the Anglo-American world order.

The fraying of the Anglo-American world order has been accelerated by global capitalism as well. The notion that capitalism increases the size of the middle classes which would demand more political accountability thereby strengthening the democratic system has been put to question. The assumption that ‘Backward Asia’ would go along the lines which the West had been through to achieve a capitalism based liberal democracy is being shattered by the experience in many countries. Hence the confidence behind prescribing Western political and economic models to the rest of the world has come down and it will never regain its previous high.

Germany has had a different path of modernization compared to the rest of the West. A latecomer to the industrial revolution, it wanted to avoid the mistakes of the first movers who moved from agriculture to industry. The welfare state was thus formed to play a crucial role in the economy as well as to provide a safety net to its citizens. The American progressive movement owes its intellectual base to this strand of thought and more so the Japanese economic thinking. Indian intellectuals in the 19th century moved beyond the work of the English intelligentsia and studied the works of German thinkers as well.

What the German historical experience offers to contemporary Asia is a different model of economic and political consolidation than the one proposed by modernization theory. For at the heart of the German way towards modernity was the major role of the state in regulating economy and society. Germany should therefore reckon with its past to understand its position in the West and go beyond the Anglo centric world order to come to terms with a rising Asia.

Related Articles