But what role does open data actually play? Benjamin Hassenfratz, who advises communities through his Smart City Engineering project, explained that when people contact IESE, the focus is not necessarily on open data. “Many cities and towns generally want to use an urban data platform to achieve in-house goals,” he said. “Open data is usually only considered as an add-on and is not the main concern.”
At the same time, there are a number of advantages to including open data from the start. Urban data platforms can reduce technical obstacles, since they make it possible to automate processes, Hassenfratz said. Moreover, open data can be stored directly on the platform and need not be transferred to an open data portal. The prerequisite, however, is that DCAT-AP.de is used as the metadata standard.
Nevertheless, municipalities face a number of challenges here. In some cases, Hassenfratz explained, data is only available in analogue form, the data format is impractical or the data is of poor quality. He offered the following advice for communities wanting to get started: They should first be clear about whether they actually need a data platform, they should identify possible benefits and use cases, and they should ensure they have support at the highest levels of the organization. And, of course, they need to clarify what everything will cost.
Marius Henkel, who is responsible for data governance and open data for the city of Kaiserslautern, then discussed the intercommunal data platform shared by six communities in Rhineland–Palatinate and Saarland. By joining forces, the municipalities have been able to split the development costs. In addition, the joint platform ensures de facto standardization, and responsibilities are spread among the different participants. There has already been a proof of concept. Like Hassenfratz, Henkel spoke of an open data portal as one use case made possible by an urban data platform.